Listen up
- Deborah Yaffe

- Oct 13
- 2 min read
No one knows how long we’ll have to wait to see the newest screen adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, the buzzy Netflix version now filming in the UK. But the latest audio version of the novel, a four-and-a-half-hour adaptation with a full cast, dropped last month, and Audible celebrated by co-hosting a New York City bash—or, rather, a “Luxe Pride and Prejudice Party.”
The party—naturally, it was “an immersive experience”—was held at a bar/restaurant with Victorian decor, so that’s not a good sign. On the other hand, there were Austen-themed cocktails, a calligraphy station where attendees could pick up a monogrammed P&P journal, and a special space for listening to the new adaptation. So I would have gone had I been invited. (Unaccountably, I was not.)
I haven’t listened to the adaptation yet, but the online reviews are raves--no surprise, given the starriness of the cast (Glenn Close! Bill Nighy! Marianne Jean-Baptiste!). Promisingly, Audible’s delightful twenty-minute promo—lots of behind-the-scenes shots of actors in jeans and T-shirts recording their lines--suggests that much of Austen’s original dialogue has been preserved, despite Audible's insistence that its adaptation is "Revolutionizing Jane Austen’s Most Beloved Novel."
The revolution, it seems, lies elsewhere, including in sound effects recorded with maximum attention to period accuracy: Audible's sound designers even dressed in Regency costume in order to capture the acoustics of swishing ballgowns in an English country house.
Which is not to say that no liberties were taken. Notably, Audible is teasingly advertising that the story ends with Elizabeth and Darcy in bed. No word on how they captured those sound effects with accuracy.





My heart quails at "revolutionizing" attempts, although I did enjoy the image at the Luxe party of the cello player surrounded by candles and what look to be cabbages. (Writing from the JASNA Annual General Meeting in Baltimore where more than 1,000 fans gathered to celebrate Austen and her written words.)
revolutions aren't always for the better, but i will withhold my judgment until i can learn more. unaccountably, i was not invited to the victorian (!) party, either.
there are few people in america, i suppose, who have more true enjoyment of live adaptations than myself, or a better natural taste. if i had attended, i should have been a great proponent. (or not).